![]() NEWSFLASH: Desperate CJP Files Lawsuit to Duck State Audit ! Ironically, a Court will get to decide if the Commission on Judicial Performance is immune from California's Sunshine Laws and First Amendment rights as the CJP fights access of the State Auditor who seeks to reveal if the CJP has been protecting California's from bad judges. (Click on link above to read CJP lawsuit) For decades people trapped in divorces have complained about unfair judges who cost them custody, property or support, based on sheer bias and abuse of discretion imposed by a single family court judge. . Many have suffered at the hand of bad judges abusing their power. While thousands of people have complained to state watchdog agencies, such as the Commission on Judicial Performance, and the State Bar, for family law litigants, nobody was answering the phone. In addition to the assured immunity (that all judges have), family law judges appear to have enjoyed additional protection by being completely "off radar" from the taxpayer funded watchdog agencies that ostensibly assure citizens receive fair and equitable divorces. At the State Bar only one of the trial counsel lawyers comes with a family law background and at the Commission on Judicial Performance, the numbers are more dismal; Jane and John Q research could not find one member of the Commission with significant family law experience. It is a virtual certainty that most of the complaints to CJP arise from individuals involved in divorce cases, It is perhaps that fact that prompted the State Legislator to order the State Auditor to audit the CJP, just as she had the State Bar in 2015. Divorce litigants up and down the state celebrated the victory of the audit after the extraordinary efforts from groups like the Center for Judicial Excellence and Court Reform LLC. in getting done what no politician or activist had done before . And while Victoria Henley, head hench woman at the CJP said she welcomed the audit, she clearly had something else in mind after her public conciliatory statement. On October 20, 2016 , CJP showed the world they still don't want to play fair and want to play by their rules, not state of federal law. The Commission filed a lawsuit that seeks to significantly restrain and limit the audit, and would render it virtually useless. Not so fast say judicial reform supporters . Social media and the modern hacktivists channels are now kicked into high gear and the little guys, the pro pers , plan a nuclear like response.. Lawyers, activists, academics and even just the litigant trapped in life by a bad judge, please contact us and join #THEMOVEMENT : Email : CalJohnQPublic@gmail.com
16 Comments
Kings and Queens Unite
10/23/2016 09:28:35 pm
1. The CJP doesn't have the money to pay for the audit, but can hire a high powered attorney who is the brother of the DA in San Mateo County. And if they don't have the money, what exactly are they doing with it?
Reply
Mari-Lynne Earls
10/24/2016 04:31:08 pm
Huge conflict of interest for judge under CJP disciplinary control to hear this case. Huge. State Auditor: State Bar failed to discipline attorney who committed fraud upon the court and extortion in 192Fl027294, judge failed to report this conduct to state bar; violation of canon 3D, CJP failed to discipline this judge after presiding judge sent my complaint to the attn. general. BIG COVERUP
Reply
mari lynne earls
10/29/2016 08:22:18 pm
recommend 'Judicial Disciplinary Hearings Should Be Open' by Robert H. Tembeckjian online, pub.The Justice System Journal Vol. 28, No. 3 (2007), sending copy to state auditor.
Reply
Anne Davis
10/30/2016 09:21:59 am
They think of us as ATM machines.
Fixed Race
10/23/2016 09:36:18 pm
The proper venue for this is Federal Court where there are no conflicts of interest.
Reply
Mari-Lynne Earls
10/24/2016 04:32:22 pm
I concur; conflict of interest, its like asking son to judge parent, you just don't dare cross the parent.
Reply
disgusted
10/28/2016 08:38:19 pm
Wrong.
Reply
Mari-Lynne Earls
10/30/2016 09:56:22 am
AGREE, FEDERAL COURT, then the gallows.
Reply
Monarchy in question
10/23/2016 09:54:48 pm
The CJP and judges on the bench don't want to be beholden to the taxpayers.
Reply
Victoria B. Henley
10/24/2016 10:46:02 am
Did she used to be a man?
Reply
Kim Likert
10/24/2016 03:13:39 pm
Why doesn't this happen in California?
Reply
Alarming Report calls on Federal Government to Investigate Serious Abuses in Divorce and Family Courts
3/13/2017 06:11:02 pm
http://linkis.com/leonkoziol.com/2017/q34nQ
Reply
disgusted
3/13/2017 06:26:57 pm
I just have my story and you can use it for free. Probate, also not for sissies. The lengths lawyers/judges go to muck up your life once you figure out the racket is truly Herculean.
Kim Likert
10/24/2016 03:46:05 pm
California is a refuge for crooks who make a living in court.
Reply
8/1/2017 12:08:03 am
When it comes to marketing and business development your best efforts are only as strong as your brand. Below I've listed the four biggest mistakes firms make when it comes to their brand...and how to avoid them.
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
|