Family Court

Santa Clara County Bar Association Luncheon Song Lyrics Released- Public Demands Removal of All Judges Attending the Holiday Event

12/22/2016

CALL TO REMOVE ALL SANTA CLARA COUNTY JUDGES ATTENDING HOLIDAY LUNCHEON HOSTED SANTA CLARA COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION

On the Monday before Christmas, the Commission on Judicial Performance, in between their lavish holiday parties, revealed that Judge Persky would not face discipline for his sentencing of Brock Turner, the white Stanford felony convicted rapist, whom Persky ordered to spend just six months in jail.

Meanwhile, and unnoticed by mainstream media, a lawsuit was filed in San Francisco, suing the Commission on Judicial Performance for its failure to investigate and discipline Judge Moss, a judge who stole the homes and life savings of elderly citizens, as he confidentially stood behind the cloak of judicial immunity and an emasculated Commission of Judicial Performance, the state funded agency that has been letting crooked judges run amok for decades.

This lawsuit, filed by the highly-respected Patrick Evans, seeks to hold judges accountable for criminal conduct that has likely harmed thousands, if not millions, of Californians.

SHOULD JUDGES ALSO BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR CONDUCT OUTSIDE THE COURTROOM THAT VIOLATES PUBLIC TRUST IN OUR LEGAL SYSTEM?

Most people who have faced a judge in traffic court, divorce court, or probate court think the answer to that question should be YES.

Santa Clara County Court Clerks and Whistleblowers who are fed up with the outright criminal conduct of family law judges in Santa Clara County decided to expose crooked judges and lawyers in another way.

Just after the Thanksgiving holiday, Whistleblowers contacted investigative reporters they knew to be covering Santa Clara County divorce cases for the past year. Whistleblowers slipped the media and advocates information and requested they photograph the Santa Clara County Bar Association holiday luncheon, where judges and lawyers were historically in attendance (as confimed in a court hearing on December 21, 2016 by Judge Towery).

On December 2, 2016, when the music started, Santa Clara County judges and lawyers broke out in song and laughed about all the money they earn in Silicon Valley divorce and custody cases.  Santa Clara County citizens deal with probate and divorce cases are furious over lyrics, and the judges and lawyers who sang them.

Judges Greenwood, Huber, Weinstein, Emede, Pegg, Rudy, Grilli, Towery, Scott and Judge Persky were celebrated by Santa Clara County lawyers who sang about the pleadings they file from their “expensive yachts”, as the judges get them “to the bank tonight “.

Ironically they song lyrics include Judge Scott helping to get them a Mercedes Benz. Judge Scott was recently disciplined by the CJP, for all the good it did.

Self-represented parents who have been sanctioned and unable to pay their own legal fees based on these same judges were not anused by the song lyrics or by the judges and lawyers who sang them. Many are demanding to know why judges are in attendance at these gatherings.

When the judges learned they had been photographed, an all-out war on the media and local court reform advocates ensued.

Judge Towery, known to be one of the most corrupt and ethically deficient judges in California, and who organizes court staffers and other judges attending such events through his private Gmail account,   denied one advocate back child support owed to her for the past two years, and just four days before Christmas, as Brad Baugh (Santa Clara County Bar Association’s newsletter editor) was able to get Judge Towery to rule that a father, Robert Bassi, didn’t have to pay child support on income he earned from passive dividends, just like Brad Baugh had convinced Judge Grilli she didn’t have to award child support for Iris Cheriton on the $542,000,000 Stanford professor David Cheriton held in stock back in the late 1990’s. The Court of Appeal said Judge Grilli was wrong.

As Towery choked down his luncheon on December 2, he did so with little concern over two rulings in cases before him where he rendered one mother and child homeless for the holidays , and sent another 20 month old child to overnight visits with former 49er Ray McDonald, despite McDonald facing criminal rape charges, and charges for violating a restraining order against the child’s mother in Janauary 2017.

See the video of Mc Donald beating the mother of his child in 2015, as she held McDonald's two month old son.

A private investigation, sparked by a whistleblower tips, shows that Santa Clara County judges, specifically Judge Towery, may be using personal Gmail accounts to not only coordinate these “private events” , but also to collect and provide favors, gifts and kickbacks to lawyers and other judges in a manner that may be outright criminal.

It is reported that Towery has accepted free 49er tickets, publishing services and other personal perks using these Gmail accounts, and then issuing rulings in divorce and custody cases without lawfully disclosing conflicts of interests.

Court files show Towery, like other Santa Clara County Judges, repeatedly deny fees to the most needy parents and children, while assuring other lawyers like Elise Mitchell and Brad Baugh make millions in fees, converted from community property or unpaid child support.

Other Judges like Greenwood, are rewarded in other ways. Following the county Bar luncheon, rumors began to fly that Greenwood would soon be appointed to the Sixth District Court of Appeal, where she can ensure the cycle of cronyism persists.

Members of Q Are Demanding Every Judge Attending the Holiday Luncheon Resign or be Removed by the CJP.

Since Canon 3 of the Judicial Code of Ethics requires judges to address attorney misconduct, many are saying these judges should all be disciplined for failing to report lawyers who attended, or were connected to the luncheon, given the violation the of public trust the luncheon appears to have caused.

Q Members are also demanding the State Bar, or the State Auditor Investigate just how much lawyers and law firms involved in this luncheon have earned in fees and sanctions, as awarded by the judges who were in attendance.

Bechtel Family Law Group &TDC ( Table 24)
Carpenter & Mayfield ( Table 8)
Hoover Krepelka ( Table 16 and 17)
BJ Faden (Table 2)
Stephen Penn ( Table 20)
Kathryn Schlepphorst (Table 19)
Travid Whitfield ( Table 23)
Morgan Tidalgo ( Table 30)

Q Members are also demanding an investigation to determine how much tax payers had to pay for the Santa Clara County Sheriffs who were either in attendance as guests for the event, or as security , where the only security they appear to have provided is investigating members of the media covering the event, not the crooked judges and lawyer who attended it.

Please sign the petition demanding the removal of all judges who mocked the poor and our children this holiday season.

5 Comments

Janet Pipes link

12/29/2016 07:01:00 pm

Thank you for exposing this.

Terry Dee Matthews

1/3/2017 03:21:17 pm

San Joaquin county is so corrupt. Nothing has gotten any better even since the horrendously corrupt district attorney John Phillips retired. I knew him through his coke dealer who I had befriended his wife. The things that went on in this County then was a joke, a sick joke but a joke. The card games down at the San Joaquin County Sheriff's Department was an abomination of what they were watching as entertainment find two-way glass. What was done to me who is guilty of nothing even if I did but I was accused of had a corrupt Deputy write an 8-page report against me without ever having any dealings with me, he was a friend of my former husband. He eventually did this to enough people that people and other law enforcement agencies knew of him and warned me to be careful. He was so over the top that he is no longer in law enforcement. It seems they either get rid of them or promote them. Depending on how bad the Scandal is. It sickens me that because I couldn't afford a bottom-feeding attorney until it was just about to late, I did nothing illegal, could have ended up spending a year in Napa. What was I guilty of according to mrs. Collins the head of Mental Health and San Joaquin County... absolutely nothing even if I did what I was accused of it wasn't illegal. All because one deputy did not like me and was a buddy of my former husband. It took almost a year-and-a-half and several thousand dollars later by having someone drive me to court because I was in a wheelchair and everything else involved. Finally I was able to scrape up $2,000 and my attorney who did virtually nothing got it dropped because I didn't do anything wrong and when I explained to my court facilitator what was going on she had me go see a person who is a vendor not a County employee but someone who gets paid by the referral to State I had a mental defect when in fact I had just went through one year of mental and physical testing in order to get on a non FDA-approved drug at Kaiser this clown who saw me for 10 minutes and I had a syndrome that takes a long time to diagnose and there is no cure and suggested I go to classes during the day at a homeless shelter. Mind you I have no immune system at this point so I guess they were trying to kill me and for what? Nothing I did nothing wrong! I was never reimbursed and no one got in trouble but it delayed me from seeking visitation of my precious granddaughters who are my life. We have no grandparent rights in California and you really have no rights if you do not have a dog in the fight meaning and Alive child who is the parent of your grandchildren. While I was fighting off those ridiculous ridiculous ridiculous charges against me my daughter was murdered so when I did finally make it to visitation Court representing myself I was turned down. My daughter's family live next door to me most of their married life except for the very end. I bought all of their vehicles. I bought the house they were living in. I saw my granddaughters daily and was a huge part of their life. I was a chaperone on their field trips Kama I was involved in their scouting and every other aspect of their life and my former husband and I we are very close with them. They never learn to talk and I didn't care. And I didn't have a relationship with them? That's all that had to be stated and I was told no way could I have one day a month to see the children I saw every day. Where is any justice in that. My son-in-law did some Slim Shady illegal stuff during the end of their marriage and I had an inkling of what was going on and he's afraid I'm going to tell his mother that is the reason for my denial and I can have no contact with my granddaughters. My former husband went with me to court and sat in the back and when he heard what the judge said and the judge wasn't finished talking he went out into the Hall and the granddaughters were there and they ran to him and hugged him. I quickly left after the job is done and I got a half a hug from one of them and they were whisked away. What can I do?

andy jackson

4/11/2017 08:29:11 am

The BAR association is a treasonus syndicate of thieves in rebellion against the Constitutions. The California State Bar association is a public corporation as stated in Aticle 6, sec.9 of the California Constitution (1879). Think long and hard on that. A public corporation.....
So how does a corporation have a monopoly on the use of the judiciary branch of government for California?
Does any corporation control how the legislative branch of government function? Does a public corporation control the governor and the executive branch of Government for Calfifornia?
What they have is a monopoloy and that is illegal under 15 USC 1 and 2.
The fact that they have usurped the legislative function by passing rules of court and applying these rules as laws that must be followed is a joke as the judges and court administrators write the rules of court not the legislative branch.
They enforce private laws instead of the Constitutional laws, ie CODES. Codes are not laws, they are crafted by BAR members not the legislators and they are copyrighted (look in the front of any law book) signifying they are private as you can only copyright your original ideas and public laws are owned by the people and cannot be copyrighted. There can only be one subject in any statute (Article 4, sec.9) and no revision of any Codes has only one subject in it, meaning all the passage of any statutes regarding 100's of codes being changed is void as un Constitutional.
The crime syndicate known as the BAR routinely denies due process, by refusing to let a man be heard on a subject he is bringing up in court and will threaten the man with contempt of court if he continues, that is open treason and rebellion (18 USC 2383) as due process is right not a priviledge that can be take away. They commit rebellion when they refuse to answer questions that concern you case because every man has a right to redress a greivance (1st amendment). There cant be a redress unless the subject is examined and authority to act is proven to exist, otherwise the 1st amendment would have stated you have a right to complain but not get an answer. How will any wrong get corrected if there is a failure/refusal to bring it forward and have a jury hear it and decide. For a judge to decide is wrong as the judge is not the trier of facts nor can he determine the law (as they do).

Justice OLIVER WENDELL HOLMES (Horning v. District of Columbia, 254 U.S. 135 (1920)): “The judge cannot direct a verdict, it is true, and the jury has the power to bring in a verdict in the teeth of both law and facts.” [verified]

The judge cannot direct a verdict. Think about how many times judges have tampered with a jury by making determinations of what they can and cannot hear as evidence. He is committing rebellion.
Judges will state such and such is a fact all the time yet he has no right to do so and is committing rebellion as his job is ministerial not to control the flow of evidence and make determinaions of what the law is as the judge in the Bundys current trial has openly stated according to the wives. She said "I will determine the law". She cannnot make any judicial determinations (cannot make any judgements) in a court of record but determinations of what are facts and what evidence can be seen and heard is directing a verdict isnt it. If i can do that in my trial i can win everytime.

4/18/2017 01:18:56 pm

JUDGE, YOU ARE FIRED!
The President, Vice President and ALL CIVIL OFFICERS of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.
You have no immunity to me in a suit for damages or for jail time in either your private or public servant capacity. TITLE 42 § 12202 A State shall not be immune. TITLE 15 § 1122 No Immunity to state actors. TITLE 42 § 1983, 1985 & 1986 which he had knowledge were about to occur and power to prevent, a deprivation of constitutional rights.
TITLE 5 PART III Subpart B CHAPTER 33 SUBCHAPTER II § 3331 Oath of office An individual, except the President, elected or appointed to an office of honor or profit in the civil service or uniformed services, shall take the following oath: “I, AB, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against ALL enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter.
You had the power to stop an illegal case and prevent the depravation of my rights!
Job Description: UPHOLD THE CONSTITUTION AGAINST ALL ENEMIES
You are summarily dismissed without benefit of any type. Your misconduct is a high misdemeanor and may be charged for treason. Just following orders to commit a crime is not a defense, nor is ignorance.
You have sworn not to violate the Constitution of the United States of America. TITLE 5§ 3331, Unless you can provide me with the witness against me, which as a public servant you cannot do.
TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 93 § 1918 Disloyalty and asserting the right to strike against the Government
Whoever violates the provision of section 7311 of title 5 that an individual may not accept or hold a position in the Government of the United States or the government of the District of Columbia if he—
(1) advocates the overthrow of our constitutional form of government;
(2) is a member of an organization that he knows advocates the overthrow of our constitutional form of government;
(3) participates in a strike, or asserts the right to strike, against the Government of the United States or the government of the District of Columbia; or
(4) is a member of an organization of employees of the Government of the United States or of individuals employed by the government of the District of Columbia that he knows asserts the right to strike against the Government of the United States or the government of the District of Columbia; shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year and a day, or both.
A high crime is equal to a felony & a felony is any term greater than 1 year.

TITLE 28 PART IV CHAPTER 85 § 1343.
(1) To recover damages for injury to his person or property, or because of the deprivation of any right or privilege of a citizen of the United States, by any act done in furtherance of any conspiracy mentioned in section 1985 of Title 42;
(2) To recover damages from any person who fails to prevent or to aid in preventing any wrongs mentioned in section 1985 of Title 42 which he had knowledge were about to occur and power to prevent;
(3) To redress the deprivation, under color of any State law, statute, ordinance, regulation, custom or usage, of any right, privilege or immunity secured by the Constitution of the United State
When a judge violates his or her oath they become a Trespasser of the Law, removes the Jurisdiction, and voids the oath of the Judge, He/She is acting as a private person upon violation of LAW and OATH. TITLE 28 PART I CHAPTER 21 § 454 Practice of law by justices and judges; Any justice or judge appointed under the authority of the United States who engages in the practice of law is guilty of a high misdemeanor.
The Supremacy Clause appears in Article VI of the United States Constitution. It establishes the Constitution, Federal Statutes, and U.S. treaties as "the supreme law of the land." State judges are required to uphold it, even if state laws or Constitutions conflict with it.
TITLE 28 PART I CHAPTER 21 § Sec. 453. Oaths of justices and judges
Each justice or judge of the United States shall take the following oath or affirmation before performing the duties of his office: ``I, ___ ___, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as ___ under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God.''

IT IS CALLED A PINK SLIP, and they work!
Any State, any county and any judge.
There are 2 things I can't get on a wholesale bases;
Accountability and Enforceability.

Mario Burnias link

6/27/2020 12:10:47 am

Judge Cynthia Lie intentionally violated my Constitutional Rights and Judge Carol Overton violated my Constitutional Rights ias well as my former tenant as a result caused him to be arrested and his father to pass as he was ill. Judge Overton conspired with Attorney Todd Rothbard I have the fraud upon the Court recorded documents that Judge Overton granted Judgement based on fraud. They are attempting to steal my $2.5 million equity. I have handed over copies to trusted family members as we are 5 generations in San Jose and have over 1000 family members in the San Jose Area. I have been a Board Member for Christmas in The Park, I have received a Commendation from the City Of San Jose for bringing Hollywood Red Carpet Experience to San Jose Disney Actors. I graduated SJSU and a Delta Upsilon Alum Barry Swenson is my Fraternity Brother. I represented DAL Properties in real estate developments. Charles Davidson was my client. I’m a fellow for former mayor Ron Gonzalez Leadership Board Program. For these two Judges to target me a local home grown Latino who has supported his community for over 30 years and attempt to steal my home separate me from my chid put me through almost 3 years of alcohol and drug testing even after ordering me to get assessment which I was declared as no habitual drug or alcohol problems. Give me 50 custody then strip it away once I no longer could afford attorney after 5 years over going over and over the cycle of custody dispute all based on fabrications. This is Racism and Discrimination. Now I have criminal charges filed against me by D A s office that are fabricated again. Little did they know I documented everything as I been reading this site and others since 2014. With the help of some law enforcement college buddies gathered enough to give to my friends at Black Lives Matter and Media relationships in Hollywood. As well as I’m on the Board for Chavez Institute of Law Social Justice with Paul Chavez grandson of Cesar Chavez. The time is now! I’m ready to show who these people really are! I would love all the support who has been harmed financially emotionally and lost years of productivity to my community and family. They need to feel that pain so they never attempt to harm citizens again. We are innocent citizens that honor our Constitution and are being harmed by criminals who are abusing their power in a racist discriminatory actions! Redemption Day is coming for the Just ! The unjust got to go!

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.

Santa Clara County Bar Association Luncheon Song Lyrics Released- Public Demands Removal of All Judges Attending the Holiday Event

Leave a Reply.

Hours

Email