In 1984 California's Attorney General Warned that Judges Disciplined by the Toothless Confidentiality Terms of the CJP, would be likely to retaliate against those who lodge complaints. Thirty years later this is what retaliation looks like where bad family court judges have hijacked justice.
Santa Clara, CA- A father dealing with false claims of Domestic Violence tried to lodge a complaint against Judge Stuart Scott. Judge Scott retaliated and sent Santa Clara County Sheriffs to the man's Grandmother, in what could be seen as nothing short of retaliation and abuse of power.
The harassment has continued as Stuart Scott has used the Sheriffs to do welfare checks on the 88 year old grandma's home, where she resides with the father who tried to complain about Stuart Scott's unlawful and unethical conduct.
As captured in the video, Judge Scott was notified by his bailiff in his court of a possible complaint. Judge Scott responded by sending sheriffs to the home of a woman who has been a resident of Santa Clara County for over 50 years.
Los Gatos Police Taking Bribes for Judge Scott
Santa Clara County Sheriffs have a long history of assisting certain law firms, and judges, in retaliating against Whistleblowers. The history includes unsettling relationships with the Los Gatos police, the same agency that first sent the father to Judge Scott's courtroom.
As a 20-year prosecutor with the Santa Clara County DA's office, Stuart Scott is reported to have longstanding relationships with Santa Clara County law firms including Hoge Fenton, and McManis Faulkner, where billions of dollars have been diverted through Santa Clara County's probate and family law cases.
During his tenure as a prosecutor, Stuart Scott reportedly assisted a core group of Silicon Valley lawyers engage in DUI ticket fixing with Judge Danser, along with former L0s Gatos Police Detective Randall Bishop, a close buddy of Stuart Scott. As a prosecutor, Scott helped members of the San Jose Sharks , 49ers and San Jose Earthquakes soccer teams, get out of criminal charges surrounding the ticket fixing scheme back in 2003.
False DV Claims Generate Money for County Jails
Scott also mastered false DV complaints and sent innocent people to jail, which was never addressed properly as a matter of public protection by the Sixth District Court of Appeal, or revealed in Santa Clara University's Innocence Project Report.
Judge Scott appears to be sending people to jail, to earn bail money for the local courts, and jails, where Scott has benefited based on his private investments. Investments that do not appear to have been lawfully disclosed on his form 700. Scott appears to be under FBI investigation as a result of these investments.
After more than $17 million dollars went missing from Santa Clara County probate courts, Scott reportedly worked with Karyn Sinunu- Towery, a nearly 30 year veteran of the Santa Clara County DA's office, to cover up the scandal.
Sinunu-Towery Cover Up Reaches State Bar
James Towery, Sinunu-Towery's husband, former Chief Trial Counsel at the State Bar, assured Scott, and other members of the DA's office, were not disciplined by either the Sixth District Court of Appeal, or the State Bar, in order to solidify Scott's ascension to the Santa Clara County bench.
Towery additionally used his connections at Santa Clara University to have Stuart Scott's name redacted from a report that should have resulted in Stuart Scott's disbarment.
When Stuart Scott was newly appointed to the bench, Judge Erica Yew reportedly cut a deal that gave Scott a mere CJP public admonishment, despite the fact that Scott violated fundamental rights and concealed evidence that could implicate trial and appeal court judges engaging in criminal conduct. Yew publically recused herself , privately Yew worked the CJP's discipline group to keep up the public image of Santa Clara County Court judges.
Unphased by his public admonishment, the county's lead judges agreed to move Scott from criminal court to family court, where Scott continues to assist judges and lawyers launder money, accept kickbacks for requested orders, and harm innocent parents who appear before him. Scott has taken over cases once assigned to Mary Ann Grilli, a controversial judge who retired in early 2017.
Since taking over for Grilli, Scott has continued to assure large fees to select law firms, while picking on self- represented parties, or parties who fail to hire lawyers in Judge Scott's good grace. Scott also has reportedly engaged in misconduct with Grilli's former court clerk and court reporter.
Judge Lucas Hides Court Sex and Assault Complaints
Silicon Valley business moguls have hacked into email accounts that show Judge Scott is continuing to sexually harass court staff, which Judge Patricia Lucas has refused to report.
Judge Scott, has been reported to have carried on with over 20 women lawyers and judges in the county. One woman reported that Scott gave her a sexually transmitted disease and threatened her in order to keep the affair, and disease, a secret.
Scott has allegedly taken millions in kickbacks as a prosecutor and judge, in return he has assured Jeff Rosen's office continues to ignore evidence of criminal conduct and misuse of public funds.
Judge Scott has been a menace to the family court system, where he continues to sexually harass women , and has participated in money laundering schemes to benefit select law firms, the courts and himself.
Parents assigned to Judge Scott's court, have been picketing and protesting in person and online, and many are considering a recall, one similar to what was seen with Judge Persky.