JANE & JOHN Q. PUBLIC
  • Home

Families Make a Difference in Court Reform- No Longer a " He Said. She Said".

10/11/2018

5 Comments

 
Picture


 For decades the leadership in California's  court system has labeled people critical of the courts as " disgruntled", or unhappy with their legal outcomes. Turns out those disgruntled parents were right, the system was corrupt. 

After years of focusing on the He Said. She Said aspect of divorce cases, public attention is now turning to what individual judges, CPS workers and private divorce lawyers are doing to families in the name of the law. 


                              Supervised Visitation Scam  & Scandal 

Most disturbing is a finding that several judges appear to be investing in Supervised Visitation Centers, and Reunification Camps, and then funding those business with referrals from  court orders by judges and lawyers who have a financial interest in those businesses. 

Whistleblowers employed with private divorce lawyers have been leaking information for months. This information includes attorney letters, secret recordings, and  fraudulent billings that reveal trust account violations and investments in these centers. 

In a divorce case it is becoming more common that parents, with no criminal history, are bring ordered to see their children only under supervision. This supervision can cost $50-150 per hour, making it cost prohibitive for most parents and putting a price tag on a fundamental right. 


                                 Parents are not Backing Down 

From protesting in Silicon Valley in the 1990s to recalling judges in multiple counties, these parents are mad and using social media, recalls and complaints to the CJP that is now being audited by the State Auditor based on parent reform groups. 

Reform groups that used to be divided , are now joining forces . Protective Moms, father's Rights and concerned grandparents are turning their attention to state bar and judge complaints. Newsletters and social media continues to provide for the main source of communication, as mainstream media remains reluctant to take on the courts. 

For 30 years family courts have operated more like playgrounds, where the popular kids prevail and the bullies get their way. But with domestic violence claims soaring, and an unprecedented number of parents being put on supervised visitation, the injustice in the state's family courts may have reached a tipping point. 

In Contra Costa  County taxpayers are about to foot the bill for the next round of judge recalls. The recall effort has already established an underground social media news network to stay informed and connected. Judges Fannin, 

After successfully recalling Judge Persky in June of this year. Santa Clara County divorce lawyers are the subject of a new antitrust complaint. That complaint reveals how Jeff Rosen, the District Attorney, has prosecuted mothers for taking $1 from a frozen bank account, as Rosen drove the get away car for   favored divorce lawyers who stole millions of dollars from families through fraudulent  transactions connected with attorney trust accounts. 

In Solano County the DA continues to prosecute perjury in family court cases and in San Diego County, court reformers continue to rallying to remove judges for public corruption. 

                                          Dr. Ford v. Judge Kavanaugh 

The recent hearings in Judge Kavanaugh's confirmation hearings brought the media to understand that it is not if women are believed, or if Judge's should have immunity from their personal conduct, it is more about what are we going to do about it when these same issues reach our family court judges. 

Political upheaval that reached the Supreme Court in recent months, just may be the best thing going for court reform advocates. 


                   Judge Lawsuits Continue to Cost Taxpayers Millions


Santa Clara County continues to lead the way in lawsuits filed against judges and divorce lawyers. Judge Patricia Lucas, and Judge James Towery rank top in costs to taxpayers. Many of these taxpayers have tired of paying the costs for bad judges. 

While many of these lawsuits will eventually be tossed out of court, the impact on social media  and in the public domain will likely haunt judges long after they leave public life. 

James Towery is also the subject of a criminal complaint, along with private divorce lawyers Lynne  Yates Carter, Margret Patrick, James Mc Manis, Donelle Morgan, Hector Moreno, Bradford Baugh, Valerie Houghton and Leah Amini. Towery and his cronies could face indictment by a federal grand jury for violating the civil rights of litigants, and  for acting with a corrupt motive to misuse his power as a judge for personal gain and profit.  James Towery's wife, Kayrn Sinunu Towery, is also reportedly being eyed for her alleged criminal activity. Ironic given her connections to Santa Clara University's Innocence Project. 
Picture
5 Comments
Ben Z.
10/14/2018 07:30:13 pm

Judge Towery extorted me.

When I didn't want to pay, his middleman (Valerie Houghton) took her services to my ex-wife.

The State Bar of California is currently investigating Ms. Houghton for this.

And now that I have filed a complaint in the District Court, my phone/ email/ and computer have been hacked.

It wasn't enough that Judge Towery left me to live in my car, made the restraining PERMANENT, he is entitled to my take away my privacy.

He is a king, not a judge.

I should have thrown gold coins at his feet when he asked for them.

Reply
Ben Z.
10/15/2018 07:11:48 pm

Judge Towery ordered that I not contact my children for LIFE.

This was after he extorted me, took money from my ex-wife, and then unlawfully removed 1/3 of the court record.


https://www.scribd.com/document/390940175/Judge-James-Towery-orders-no-contact-with-children-FOR-LIFE

Reply
A. Wolff
10/24/2018 09:43:58 am

There is a clear pattern here. Houghton was part of a “Young Children’s Settlement Team” associated with this court. You should investigate this for additional financial connections and insider actions.

Reply
Ben Z.
10/30/2018 07:59:28 pm

Valerie,

You did this to my kids.

I didn't want to pay you or Leah anymore. You were just making up numbers.

Didn't bother to even give me invoices.

Then turned around and offered your "services" to the Petitioner.


What kind of a life are they supposed to have now?


But what would you care?

You have your money.

Reply
Silesia Wellbrock
7/4/2019 04:43:01 am

I have proof of this happening in the Texas family court. Who can I contact to discuss exposing a court appointed official that I have on tape?

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

We Would Love to Have You Join us or point us to a problem!


Proudly powered by Weebly

Hours

M-F: 7am - 9pm

Email

caljohnqpublic@gmail.com
  • Home