JANE & JOHN Q. PUBLIC
  • Home

Santa Clara County D.A. Indictment:  Family Law "Custody Expert" -Links to CPA, Sean Connery, Stanford, and Salinas Valley?

3/18/2016

9 Comments

 
Picture
Picture
Picture
Family law litigants  have complained about misconduct issues related Valerie Houghton's involvement in their custody disputes for years, so many  were not surprised to learn that Ms. Houghton and her husband have been  brought up on over 50 counts of felony theft, fraud and embezzlement in  Santa Clara County Superior Court earlier this week, Santa Clara County Case #C1632534- DA Case No. RF-1403-21813.
​
For those familiar with Ms. Houghton's close ties to family law attorney,  Bradford Baugh, a Stanford University graduate, it was not a surprise that the egoistical narcissistic family lawyer is rumored to be an attorney involved in the case, as is Richard Roggia, who appeared on the record as the Houghtons were indicted, Mr. Roggia's pro tem assignments looking a little less shiny with his colleagues as a result.

​Brad Baugh has been terrorizing mothers in Santa Clara Family Court  property and  custody battles for decades. In those battles, Mr. Baugh routinely selects Ms. Houghton as one of the players when a complex case involves custody disputes. Baugh's other players include;  Nat Hales as a Special Master, Jim Butera  as a forensic CPA, Tim Harper as a vocational examiner and Garrett Dailey for appeals Mr. Baugh's  wealthy clients an pay for. .
​It now seems no small coincidence  that the State Bar is investigating Nat Hales, related to a real estate issue involving fee awards Mr. Hales made to Mr. Baugh. Or that Brad Baugh is being investigated himself by the State Bar related to misuse of his trust account and a mysterious  transfer of $260,000 from a community business bank account, in his client's name, bearing the name of Brad Baugh on a transaction that indicates a violation of court orders  where Mr. Baugh may have assisted his client. Robert Bassi, with tax and child support evasion.

​James Butera, CPA, is also being investigated by the California Board of Accountancy, after being paid over $100,000  in a divorce case where e forgot to account for the  money an opposing party placed in Brad Baugh's  trust account, as .Butera acted as a joint financial expert.

​The wife in that case sued Mr. Butera for negligence, which Mr. Butera attempted to have thrown out  with an Anti- Slapp motion 425.16.  Mr. Butera's fancy malpractice paid Anti- Slapp motion was  denied by Judge Lucas, a former member of the Elkins Task Force. 

Mr. Butera has appealed Judge Lucas' denial, rather than repay the wife the $100,000 she claims he took while acting with gross negligence in her divorce case.

Butera doesn't appear to need the money as he  makes millions each yet mostly working divorce cases for a core group of cronies in Santa Clara County. yet, he and members of his firm , including Mike Shumway (son of famous cardiac surgeon , Norman Shumway. of  Stanford University), appear to have  no trouble stretching the financial facts in divorce cases  to harm women and children and conceal deep fraud in businesses operated by husbands. Just like Valerie Houghton and her husband appear to have done.

​Santa Clara has been plagued with issues involving the misconduct of custody evaluators and fiduciaries for decades. The county has essentially ignored the Elkins mandates, and even their own taskforce investigations related to custody and corrupt fiduciaries involved in divorce and probate cases.  One such taskforce in 2012 was led by Mary Ann Grilli, along with California Senator Jim Beall and other members of the political and legal landscape in Santa Clara County. Birds of a feather, or so it would now seem.

​​ Is Mary Ann Grilli in on helping conceal misconduct imposed in divorce cases before her?

Valerie Houghton's indictment may be just the tip of the iceberg of Santa Clara Family Court Corruption,  a world where  fraud, concealment, and corporate theft and  dirty lawyers and judges help wealthy divorce litigants  avoid tax, support and equitable divisions of community property.  Investigating Ms. Houghton may  be the first step in showing  the systemic pattern of abuse and misconduct that Santa Clara County citizens have complained about for years.  

​Ms. Houghton,  a lawyer and well-known family law " custody" expert, and her Intero real estate agent Terry Houghton,  are alleged to have woven a pattern of fraud fraught real estate transactions that include fraudulent credit card charges, bad faith partner dealings and connections to  local property real estate deals known in Los Gatos  as the Bicknell and Kennedy Road projects. Also included in the indictment are  properties connected to  the Dry Creek Area of Campbell, the Mitchell Development Group in Los Gatos and those under  MetaView Wholesale Inc. The indictment includes  allegations and  conflicts  of  interest involving Clyde Berg, Chris Ellis and a connection to  well know real estate mogul in Gilroy,  Felice. The Santa Clara County District Attorney's indictment of the Houghton's implies  Felice funded projects rooted out by Cliff Johnson.

​The indictment  alleges Houghton is associated with the operation of  a local " Friend's Project"  wherein people the Houghtons tried to gain favor with were provided "free contracting and remodel services". One such project provided Rick Jay's house in the Willow Glen area of San Jose approximately $20,000 in  kickback freebies.   Cliff Johnson , who is  reported to have been used by Felice to root out deals for MetaView, LP ,  was himself provided a free remodel of his kitchen that included Viking appliances  installed and charged to MediaView, LP ( project in Gilroy).

The indictment alleges the Houghton's stole from MetaView, LP by using an  American Express credit card  and other money  that elevated the lifestyle of the Houghtons, including;  $160,000 in season tickets for the Forty- Niner games, lavish dinners and golf lessons at Corde Valle  Country Club in San Martin and funding the largest private wine locker at Morton’s Steakhouse in San Jose for the Houghtons and their children. The Houghtons even  paid for college expenses and  extravagant  Marriott vacations through questionable transactions  as the Houghtons and their children  drove new cars, including an Aston Martin and an Audi A8.  

​​Accountants in the Houghton indictment were not named , but in Brad Baugh's dissolution cases, accountants like James Butera, and Chuck Doglione  appear to be willing to risk their licenses by failing to assure income is lawfully reported, while  acting with gross negligence as  licensed  Certified Public Accountants  during dissolution proceedings.
​
It appears the fraud many of Mr. Baugh's clients may be engaging in during their divorces is a boilerplate plan Mr. Baugh employs for  all of his wealthy clients steal community property from their former wives and children during long drawn out divorces. 

A memo recently leaked from Mr. Baugh’s office stated that a client, Robert Bassi,  needed to be patient, as it would be a “ slow process”, but that such process  would "hopefully" prevent his  former wife from getting her half of the community farming  businesses. 

Tim Harper, a vocational examiner in San Jose ,  is also routinely used by Mr. Baugh and his ill intended clients, For years Mr. Harper has been  used by Mr. Baugh where Mr. Baugh's clients pay Mr. Harper more than they save by getting income imputed to their former spouses, to avoid supporting their children, and to hide their fraud in businesses.    Mr. Harper appears to be one of Mr. Baugh's bad actors, and  regularly appears before Judge Grilli, where she seems to  use Tim Harper to rubber stamp any request made of Brad Baugh.

Mr. Harper is used  by Brad Baugh for divorce cases involving clients like Robert Bassi,  Oliver Garbe , Evan Brooks and David Cheriton. An email  from Harper's Office to Brad Baugh shows Tim Harper's office  tried to discredit and defame  at least one of the wives , rather than perform an honest vocational exam. Court files also show  Harper got another wife imputed for child support making up jobs the woman could never actually get in Silicon Valley's tech industry. Then Baugh got Mary Ann Grill to    impute  a former wife  for phantom income, and after Baugh and Allan worked over 10 years to bankrupt the woman and strip her of 50% custody, without good cause.

​In that  case   Mr. Baugh represents a wealthy client, Oliver Garbe, the step son of Sean Connery. In December 2013 a letter emerged where it appears  Brad Baugh and children's lawyer Heather Allan, split a final payment from a house sale, without permission or legal authority to do so. The money was a final payment  from the sale of Mr. Garbe’s former wife's home, which was ordered by presiding judge Mary Ann Grilli, and    largely went to pay the expenses of the  husband's lawyer, Brad Baugh, which have now reportedly reached over $3,000,000 for a middle class California divorce.

As Oliver Garber used Baugh to sell his former wife's house, ​stealing nearly all the proceeds that were part of her inheritance,  Oliver's own mother and her famous husband , Sean Connery, were embroiled in defending tax evasion charges in Spain, which  still are pending and could send Oliver Garber's mother. to jail  in Spain. Will authorities from Spain  arrive on Brad Bush's door to investigate if he helped Oliver Garber hide any of the stolen funds?

Brad Baugh appears unconcerned and has obtained Garrett Dailey for Oliver Garbe to  fight wife's appeal of an attorney award she was ordered to make to Brad Baugh, as she was unemployed, on Medicare and where Baugh had managed to her the former wife declared a vexatious litigant,  solely  because she sought time with her children and tried to  call attention to fraud Garbe appears to have subjected her too.

​For the mother's appeal   Baugh  retained  Garrett Dailey, once champion of  Jeffery Elkins,  to deny the wife her day in appeals court, after Mr. Baugh had  her denied her day in trial court for property and custody issues.

​Ironically it was  Baugh's client , Oliver Garbe , spent 10 years bankrupting and harassing his former wife in a California divorce court , Oliver's own  mother, wife of movie star, Sean Connery,   Roquebrune , is facing felony like charges herself , in Spain, and in what also appears to be use of lawyers and CPAs to avoid tax and launder money in that country. Like mother, like son ?

​In the case involving Robert Bassi, Nat Hales was appointed as  Special Master, where Nat Hales never issued a required conflict of interest disclosure, which was required by court order, and which would have revealed the close ties of Mr. Hales to Mr. Baugh, Rich Roggia  and Mr. Butera, and their involvement in the costly Brooks case where they each made self described   "gobs" of cash.  Did any such  cash go to pay the Houghtons  for backroom custody and real estate deals in Brad Baugh's or Rich Roggia's cases? Or did that include cash that Baugh kicked back   to Hales in a back-alley-like bribe where $28,000was delivered to Hales in ex parte communication effort that Baugh is known for.

 The record in Robert Bassi's case  shows  that the husband admitted he first retained Valerie Houghton as a " custody expert", who is now indicted for felony crimes .

​In that same case,  Nat Hales banked a bribe from Baugh, by  depositing it,  on his own order, to  his own trust account,  Hales then used his authority to award Mr. Baugh $50,000 in  fees as Brad Baugh, as the two concealed  how the money paid to Hales was derived . The wife has alleged  the funds Baugh gave to Hales were laundered by Robert Bassi , with the help of his  shady business partners and family members from at least six   California Corporations; California Seed Production, Inc. , California Seeds, Inc., North American Seed Company, Daniel A Bassi Properties, LP ,  AgriCoat, LLC. and Tanimura and Antle,  all  companies tied to Salinas Valley agriculture and an important part of California's food supply.

  Also in that case,  Nat Hales ordered the sale of a Gilroy Property , after his own son, Greg Hales, had been promised a kickback commission from the sale by Intero real estate agent Patty Filice,  Mr. Hales' conflict of interest notwithstanding, and leading to one more appearance of real estate fraud being imposed in Mr. Baugh's divorce cases.

​Did Mr. Baugh take on Ms. Houghton's case to monitor authorities closing in on his own  misconduct ? Or as a kickback to Ms. Houghton for years of assistance in misusing family courts to benefit his wealthy clients?  Was Brad Baugh hoping to get one of the crooked family law judges, like Mary Ann Grilli, to hear Ms. Houghton's criminal case? Or will the case be brought up before Judge Scott, a Santa Clara criminal judge, who has already been judicially disciplined through public admonishment, and likely would let Mr. Baugh run away with a corrupt verdict as he does in family law cases on a daily basis?

Rumors of cash kickbacks to Mr. Baugh and his " experts" have circulated in Santa Clara Family Courts for decades, 
​
​Maybe it isn't a surprise that Brad Baugh represents a divorce client who is the son of the famous Sean Connery,  and  who recently hired Garrett Dailey to go after his former wife's appeal of Brad Baugh's attorney fee award.

Maybe it isn't a coincidence that another of Mr. Baugh's cases now involves a former US Attorney General, who also can't shake bias Judge Grilli shows for every lawyer or litigant who opposes Brad Baugh ,even when Baugh is representing  Evan Brooks, who is alleged to be engaging in Corporate fraud like Mr. Baugh's other clients appear to be able to so freely do during divorce proceedings where they are represented by Baugh.

​Maybe it isn't a coincidence that the forensic CPA, James Butera,   used by Mr. Baugh in well-funded divorce cases,  is now appealing the denial of an Anti- Slapp where a woman finally spoke up about Mr. Butera’s negligence during the course acting as a joint forensic Certified Public Accountant in a  divorce case.

​Maybe it isn't a coincidence that Brad Baugh's preferred custody expert, who is connected to real estate, is being indicted by the Santa Clara County District Attorney.

​Maybe it isn’t a coincidence that all this is finally coming out after Santa Clara County recently attracted the attention of a team of investigative reporters.
​

Picture
9 Comments
Mothers of Santa Clara County
3/21/2016 10:55:16 pm

Hooray for the DA- this bitch has been stealing our custody time for years, all to line her own pockets . And she and Brad Baugh are the biggest crooks in the valley- Stop them good this time! Disbar them both !

Reply
Debbie Carroll
3/22/2016 12:59:54 pm

Same story here in Colorado, just change the names, and then the courts, to include probate, juvenile, family, divorce, and foreclosure. Our judicial system is being run by corrupt, or frightened, brokers.

Reply
Andy Rose link
3/23/2016 02:11:18 pm

Hi Debbie, I'd like to know more about what you know about Colorado. We are meeting with Rep. Singer to raise concerns re CFI/PRE process. please call 303 532 6780 or email me andrewnewkirkrose (at) yahoo (dot) com

Reply
Sylvia
6/15/2016 09:50:24 pm

I am surprised at reading this venomous and heavily biased report. I am a single mom where my son was being severely abused by my rich hot shot MD x-husband and I was not only being shifted around in the courts, I was also being kept poor by blatant idiotic behavior by his rich hot shot lawyer who used the same venemous vocabulary used in this article trying to discredit me. It was only by Mr. Baugh's excellent and level headed representation that my x-husband does not have the ability to abuse our son anymore, and it was only by Ms. Houghton hard work that our son has been able to heal somewhat, and become a normal person. All of this was done via very fair compensation, and I certainly was not your 'wealthy ' clientele. I do remember that my x did throw these same accusations at him the same way he tried to call me a slut and a lesbian at the same time. I wonder sir, have you been losing cases as well? Have you not been getting your BS heard in a fair court and that's why you have to advertise it on the Internet?

Reply
John Lehman
1/19/2017 09:17:27 pm

Tim Harper did a vocational assessment in our family's divorce. I think he did a good job.

The article does appear to me to be written with some bias; however, I agree that there's a lot of bad behavior by some court appointees, and at least one of my friends died an early death after being abused by courts, appointees, and officials in his divorce for 14 years.

I believe he would have lived 20 more years, and it would have been a good life, if he'd been treated fairly. And his children would have been happier and better off, with him, too.

He was a victim (and, thereby, indirectly his children were victims) of one of the standard witch hunts of our society. I say indirectly his children were victims; but it was terrible for them also, when they were very young.

There are a stock collection of accusations, in our society, like magic words which, if recited enough times, will ruin a person, no matter what he or she ever actually did or didn't do.

These accusations are sometimes true and are sometimes false. Generally, people have not bothered to count how many of each kind are false; but many are false.

Oftentimes, the courts refuse to judge cases on the case merits, but instead rely on stereotyping, because it's easier.

The original accusations sometimes represent real problems, and sometimes are just used like magic incantations to gain advantage.

Generally there has not been much bother to count how many are true and how many are false. Most people, including judges, never get past the "where there's smoke there must be fire" notion, and they pass judgement in their own minds early on, and then really couldn't care less whether the opposite conclusion could be true; they don't seriously consider the possibility.

For the many cases when they are false: Just some of the magic incantations of our day are: "violence against a woman", "parental alienation syndrome" (this one is often used against women), "sexual abuse against a child" (I've seen where this was used against a woman in one case, and used against a man in another case -- ruining each of them without any reasonable judicial process). Society has abandoned reason in these cases, and relies on stereoptyping instead, and the judges usually just follow the trend of society.

One accusation was made up out of whole cloth against the above-mentioned man, and the courts and appointees and other officials either ran with it or neglected justice for him for 14 years. Even when he won in trial, the officials did not enforce the court order that was in his favor.

After 14 years of runarounds and abuses against him, then he died.

Two or three of my other friends (also men, as it happens) have wasted away similarly: one of them also died, at least partly because of financial abuse toward him from courts in a divorce, and at least one other disappeared and probably died. These people are wasting away and dying early deaths in their 50s or very early 60s.

The courts want them to give up, but they cannot give up, because they cannot stop caring about their children. So they die trying to get reasonable treatment and reunification with their children.

At least one of my women neighbors was also treated unfairly in the court system and ended up moving out of state to get away from it. It was just another typical witch hunt and persecution (different types of witch hunts and persecutions occur against each gender and each sex), part and parcel of our society today.

I was one of the lucky ones: I had a strong case; but I could still have been ruined, when all it takes to be ruined is just false accusations and bad judges, anyway. I was exhausted by just such things. I was lucky in more ways than I'm listing here; lucky because I had a strong evidentiary case (and I refused to give up) and lucky because my ex-spouse did not really want to finish me off.

Don't let any male bias nor female bias throw you off the scent: the root problems are not gender based. The root problems have to do with obscure processes and generally wrong ideas about what courts do. Genuinely open courts with tape recordings would be a big part of the solution to this overall problem. When people can see what's going on, then the learning and solving can develop.

Reply
Jane and John Q link
1/20/2017 12:59:24 am

Thank you for your thoughtful and detailed comments. Sadly Tim Harper is not a good guy. When he is in a case where a lawyer like Brad Baugh is funding his fees, he is anything but fair. He imputed a mother $150,000 a year in income, when the mother was only able to get a job at $40,000 and was nearly 60 years old. Harper is sloppy and a crook. Another litigant he offered a tit for tat, if she would give one of his friends a job. He also investigates far more than vocational skills and is a social media stalker, assisting in creating false income levels , which are typically aimed at supporting the party paying Harper's fees, and where Harper will say the ridiculous, denying children real child support based on guidelines and state law.

Radley Law link
7/20/2016 04:58:27 am

Update: New Family Law Forms ... The child protection system · Domestic Violence · Do-it-Yourself Family Law Packets · Other family and related issues.

Reply
clyde berg
8/8/2016 02:34:26 pm

baugh helped my ex set me up w/false criminal charges & represented her in divorce.not his 1st I'm sure!!!!!!!!
he is the worst abuser of the courts in history.
what can we do to get him charged w/his crimes?
is anyone pursuing this.
how can I help.

Reply
M L Earls
10/20/2016 04:19:52 pm

Case No. 192FL027294: vanessa zecher represented Petitioner, tried to scare her into waiving guideline child support, when she refused to waive, Zecher helped opposing counsel by making two tries to get her replacement to sign settlement to get order absent Petitioner's consent,the opposing counsel used draft of settlement to get order from Judge Johnson. This is fraud upon the court. 2011, Judge Leslie NIchols given all the facts and evidence, fails to vacate void order, declares Petitioner vexatious, fails to report attorney Canon 3D. this order is void for lack of jurisdiction. Thanks, San Jose judiciary.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

We Would Love to Have You Join us or point us to a problem!


Proudly powered by Weebly

Hours

M-F: 7am - 9pm

Email

caljohnqpublic@gmail.com
  • Home