Women District Attorneys (Diana Becton and Nancy O'Malley) - Take on Family Court Judges, CPAs and Divorce Attorneys
As newly elected district attorney Todd Spitzer investigates family court clerks, custody evaluators and private judges involved in custody and divorce cases in Orange County, California's two most powerful female district attorneys began to look at family court cases that have been ignored by male their male counterparts for decades.
CONTRA COSTA DA DIANA BECTON &
IRS INVESTIGATE CPAs USED IN DIVORCE CASES
Diana Becton became Contra Costa County DA following the exposure of criminal activity involving Mark Peterson. Peterson was indicted, blasted in the news and disbarred by 2017 in large part based on public outrage that a DA had corrupted the cozy East Bay communities and allowed family courts to run amok for the past two decades.
Becton is reportedly mindful that family court reformers have managed to get the Grand Jury to investigate the county's CPS and Family Court Services staff investigated and now Becton has an opportunity to investigate CPAs including Jack Peth, Charles Burak, Sally White, Michael Thompson, James Butera and others who are known for not adding properly when it comes to the fair division of community property in divorce cases.
A small group of accountants have been regularly acting in appointed or retained capacities in family law cases, and many of these CPAs have been cooking the books, concealing corporate profits and helping law enforcement officers, tech executives, and even judges engage in tax fraud and tax evasion for decades. Criminal IRS investigators are also reportedly conducting an investigation of several CPAs who acted in high profile divorce cases in a manner that concealed income from the government.
Ms. Becton was recently named to Governor Gavin Newsom's Judicial Selection Committee. It is reported she is mindful of the public outrage that led to an audit of the CJP, the agency that disciplines the state's judges. Many in California's court reform movement come from family court experiences and were largely responsible for getting the audit, and recalling Judge Persky in Santa Clara County in June of 2018.
ALAMEDA DA NANCY E. O' MALLEY ASKED TO INVESTIGATE LAWYER PERJURY
District Attorneys across the state are asked on a daily basis to investigate perjury and filing of false documents in family court cases.
" We have divorcing couples send transcripts of their former spouse testifying in family court and ask us to investigate perjury related to that testimony. Sadly, while the general public may believe perjury is clear cut, it is not. It is very difficult to prove and frankly we don't have near enough resources to investigate these crimes, " described public corruption investigator John Chase of the Santa Clara County District Attorney's Office after a perjury charge involving attorney Bradford Baugh was brought to his attention in 2015.
What Mr. Chase refused to investigate in 2015 has now landed on the desk of Ms. O" Malley where Mr. Baugh appears to have committed perjury in a video deposition conducted by a former client. Mr. Baugh has been appointed to represent children in San Mateo and Santa Clara county divorce and custody cases for over two decades.
As many lawyers express they aren't worried Ms. O'Malley will actually start prosecuting perjury in family law cases, a few admit that the perjury of divorce attorney Bradford Baugh would be significant given Baugh's involvement in hundreds of Silicon Valley's high profile cases, including cases before Judge Persky, where Mr. Baugh represented he served in Vietnam.
One lawyer regularly appointed to represent children in San Mateo and Alameda County noted he has been aware Mr. Baugh has been court appointed to represent children in addition to typically representing high asset earners in Silicon Valley's tech and social media industries.
" I thought Baugh served in Vietnam as I heard him discuss it in court before Judges on a regular basis. Pretty sure Judge Persky, Judge Swope , Judge Hill ,and Judge Towery believed he was in the military as well. Certainly doesn't seem that anyone should be appointed to represent children if they spend decades lying about having served in the Vietnam war", the attorney said asking to remain off the record.
Bill Dok, Baugh's former partner claimed to be embarrassed he had been partners with Baugh when Baugh was lying to the family law community. But Mr. Dok may have more than embarrassment to worry about if Mr. Baugh was earning money that paid law firm expenses as Baugh committed perjury in a deposition with a former client.
BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILDREN
In the name of the best interest of children, family court judges have issued orders that have resulted in billions of dollars being spent on lawyers, custody evaluations and sham therapists. These judges have done little for children and more for a crony network that has highjacked California's legal system.
Lawyers willing to lie, judges willing to cheat and Rule of Law that has been abandoned in family court has inflicted more harm on children than at any other time in California's history.
WHAT IF INJUSTICE HITS YOUR HOME?
Due process is not alive and well in California's Courts. Q has been dedicated to matching families with like issues and regional areas. If you have suffered injustice in California's Family Courts, Email us with your case number, judge, lawyers and experts. Post comments naming the judges and lawyers under anonymous name to prevent retaliation.
All contacts will be carefully vetted and audited before connected to others. Judges and lawyers have been known to read this website and act in a retaliatory manner when the get caught.
7/8/2019 01:10:16 am
Judge Laura Masunaga, Siskiyou County Superior Court
7/8/2019 10:50:32 am
Judge Joni Hirmaoto of Martinez made orders without any evidence and against state policy removing a child from his only custodial party since birth suspending the mother to two times per year optional visitations and conditional vacations in addition she gagged contemptet the mother extorting fines and removed child support all on exparte with evidence of exparte unlawfully and sadistic laughter about the mother accent in collusion with power perjury king attorney Terrence Doyle of Famvile that orchestrated the entire fraud of a piece meal litigation despite an existing stipulated judgement of LA. He lied and lied and lied and judge made all orders in the extreme detriment of the child only on the lawyer false assertions not one evidence or witness but against court documents and orders and judgement irrefutable evidence or matter of facts like the residence in a different city in LA. To cover up she recently five a Vexatious Litigant order preventing the mother to bring evidences to light and tight to remedy or access to her child. Judge Hiranoto did so in exparte in complete disregard of the federal removal filled a day prior to the hearing of June 29th. She went ahead and made orders before a remand and against federal law again against all laws or evidence on fraud stating the mother filled five motions in five years ( when case shows only 3) and grater did above 49 in the same time. The la k of legitimacy of this court orders and extreme unchecked bias favors personal interest that got her realected is a unberable mockery of the people ‘s life and justice system
7/13/2019 04:36:55 am
I've talked to both of those District Attorney's offices. Nothing. I think it's counterproductive to scream like banshees outside of their offices. It will hurt the cause. Calmly holding signs seems to bring the most attention. Simply showing up to keep the pressure on but not being confrontational or someone may end up arrested, as we've seen.
7/15/2019 02:46:09 pm
Stop jumping around from one county to another. Do a thorough job and bring down one county instead and show actual proof instead of hopping around. This hopping around doesnt proove anything until you actually bring down a county.
7/15/2019 02:52:58 pm
Hopping around county to county without showing actual proof only causes confusion.
7/23/2019 02:45:35 pm
My families estate was taken to CA from Wisconsin because the probate system is so corrupt there. Not only did my evil brother steal my entire inheritance from both myself and my son- but, they also devastated our bank account, got us so caught up in the web of evil they started in 5 state and illegally foreclosed my residence and attempted to consume my other two properties as well via Comerica Trust Bank in MN (now closed) and Seterus /DBA Bank of America. Chase Bank was involved in the illegal foreclosure and instructed by the Independent Mortgage Review (Urban Housing ) to pay me for the loss they caused during the sale of MLS listed $174,999 house. Chase sent me a check for $8.98 Dec 2016 after all those years- Chase told me to sue their attorney Gray, End and Associates in Milwaukee,wi - How lame is that? Please contact the ME2 movement and tell them my bully brother Keith Mueller and his corrupt attorney buddy Stuart Gober Schmidt of Los Gatos, CA - from College days in Chicago, IL need to pay up! I guess they know the same people as that EMPIRE starr who got off of all those felonies alleging being attacked by his co- stars . There is no justice in California - everyone just gets paid off. Its been 10 years and I still can't get a court date- they screwed over the attorney I did have and went to every attorney in the state so I couldn't hire them - its called conflict of interest.
7/31/2019 03:51:28 pm
Looks like Probate Court is just as corrupt.with families loosing their estates in California by implementing the same judicial machinations. This is especially horrific in Contra Costa County at the Superior Court. Our family has suffered under the same judicial corruption. One of the same judges name has received multiple complaints. Going forward the victims of probate and family court should become a united front against the horrific injustices.
12/10/2019 08:12:28 pm
San Bernardino CA family court. Judge Michele Henderson Gilleece is biased against men. Ex parte applications of TRO for women filing against men are granted 100% of time. Grants permanent DVROs filed by females against males 94% of time when parties appear. Grants permanent DVROs filed by males against females 5% of time when parties appear. Requests to renew permanent DVROs are granted 100% of time by constantly falling back on the reasonable apprehension of fear standard as a justification with no acts needed or even considered. Judge Gilleece will give favorable rulings and findings to female attorneys and attorneys she taught at La Verne SOL Actual evidence is constantly dismissed over intentional fabrication als over embellishment of female litigants and female attorneys. No principals of equity exist in Dept S48.
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply.