SEX AND THE LAW
The Great Sex Debate continues to roar in the law. We have recently seen an increase in women suing large law firms for pay suppression, a national debate judge getting to the legal community .
We continue to see moms and dads blaming gender on custody and support issues, fueling the emotional stress of custody cases and largely serving to harm children , who will grow up blaming one gender or another fro various problems in the world, a very dangerous place for society to go.
What About Sex and the Law?
Are our gender norms and mores so set that it will be impossible to adjust our legal system to a state of true gender neutrality when it comes to questions involving sex?
Brad Baugh, nefarious Santa Clara County lawyer continues to ask women and men during depositions when was the last time they had sex with their former mate. Brad Baugh knows this question has no legal basis related to date of separation , as it used to, however, Mr. Baugh asks such questions to intimidate and embarrass an opposing side, an unscrupulous strategy in litigating his divorce cases.
If Mr.. Baugh asks such a question of a man, and the man had experienced sexual dysfunction during marriage, he might be embarrassed to report in the public domain the last time he was able to have sex with his wife.
In the alternative when Mr. Baugh asks such a question of a woman, he clearly does so to reduce her to the 1950's mentality that a woman had a duty to maintain the sexual needs of her spouse, and if she did not , there must be something wrong with her.
The sex question no longer has any legal basis in determining date of separation during a divorce and lawyers who continue to use it, are engaging in acts of moral turpitude.
What about Judges? How does the Great Sex Debate impact them ? An article recently published on Law.com, titled : Is There a Roger Ailes Lurking in Your Firm ? , may provide some insight.
The article addresses why it is so hard for women in law firms to bring gender based claims, stating , in part:
Part of the reason bad behavior by powerful men continues is that women are reluctant to report it—and for good reason. Stanford Law School professor Deborah Rhode writes in Harvard Business Review on Aug. 10:
“Research in ‘What Women Want’ [Rhode’s book] indicates that only about 5 to 15 percent of victims formally complain of harassment and only 3 percent of cases end up in litigation. Major barriers to reporting include guilt, shame, fears of retaliation, concerns about loss of privacy, and doubts that an effective response will be forthcoming.”
However, what is more interesting is the article's touching on how we respond to sex and sexual harassment issues based on our age and demographics. The article begins with :
Were you truly that shocked about the allegation that CEO Roger Ailes hit up Fox News anchor Gretchen Carlson and other female employees for sex?
I think that might depend on how old you are. If you’re 50 or over, Ailes’ behavior might not be entirely surprising. Though Ailes’s alleged behavior lacked finesse even by the antiquated standards of the 1980s, I bet many women in the pre-Anita Hill era experienced or witnessed some icky stuff that would be considered unthinkable today. (Ailes resigned recently, after the network hired Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison to investigate the allegations.)
So since most judges ( perhaps all ) , are men over 50 , what does this mean for the Great Sex Debate in our legal system?
Are judges more apt to be biased against a stay- at- home dad?
Are judges more likely to think women shouldn't worry their pretty little heads about complex business matters?
Are judges less likely to take the expert test0omy of a man or women seriously when the person has broken the traditional gender bias roles in a profession? For example, will a judge think less of the testimony of a male nurse , or a female CPA? What about men or women lawyers, are there dangerous patterns there?
It is time to bring our legal system into the new age. We can't fix the gender bias issues that continue to plague our legal system if we don't talk about them.
8/19/2016 07:25:41 am
We are all crazy imagining that Judge Towery profits from making specific decisions in court.
Your opinion differs from reports and documents we have received from Anonymous. Towery is a known philanderer . Before he was a judge we have reports from women in the legal commutiy that indicate Towery not only didn't respect his wives, he didn't respect the mistresses that broke up his marriages.
Leigh Anne Rooney
8/19/2016 11:36:57 am
Gross and disappointing Baugh asks questions like that. I would have been happy to tell him that wasn't his business if he was depositioning me. We need to remember that it is ok to have self respect and boundaries even in legal matters....
Valerie Houghton's imanginary bunk mate
8/21/2016 05:27:17 pm
Does anyone think Valerie Houghton fears going to jail for bribing judges to get cases?
8/23/2016 04:25:47 pm
How do they get away with it?
8/24/2016 12:32:54 pm
Why does our society allow courts to abuse children?
8/24/2016 12:51:06 pm
Our press, the Judicial Counsel, the Sate Bar, and most lawyers and judges stand for the abuse that takes place with their silence. Even law enforcement indirectly stands for child abuse and bribery.
8/24/2016 01:06:19 pm
Why is the FBI not investigating?
I love Ms. Houghton
8/24/2016 01:11:08 pm
Law enforcement already has all of Valerie Houghton's emails.
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply.