Victim Looting: Persky Recall and Judge Weil Divorce Turn Focus to District Attorney Jeff Rosen

As the Persky recall raged in Santa Clara County, few people noticed that in Iowa, an investigation  arose because of a judge's divorce case. That investigation revealed that a judge had been allowing "winning" attorneys to draft orders in a manner that caused the judge to improperly decide over a dozen cases.
 
That same conduct has been occurring  in California divorce  and probate cases for  the last decade, and now a similar investigation is turning to judges and lawyers in Santa Clara, and Contra Costa counties, where local prosecutors have ignored complaints from victims involved in domestic violence and fraud. 

The highly contested recall is starting a conversation about women who make false allegations and real victims being  ignored by the legal system. More importantly,  attention is now  turning to judges and lawyers involved in what is reportedly a deeply broken system, dominated by a few very corrupt individuals disguised as lawyers and judges. 

Divorce papers of Judge Ed Weil, and other controversial judges,  show that Aaron Persky was part of a culture that decimates women in their places of work, their homes  and legal affairs.   Weil's former wife was pro per, as are 90% of folks in California's divorce cases,  and all signs point to Weil using the Contra Costa courts in a manner that victimized the mother of his children, a pattern woven throughout his orders in probate and family court. 

Contra Costa County Judge Bruce Mills, disciplined at least 5 times,  was ultimately  the subject of an investigation that will likely see him removed from the bench, saving Contra Costa tax payers the expense of a recall as the CJP does their job for the first time in decades. 

                             FOLLOWING THE MONEY IN THE PERSKY RECALL








An 

The Persky recall is breathing new life into   FPPC investigations  based on the  legal bills of James McManis, and the endorsements made by Jeff Rosen, the "granddaddy" of endorsements in Silicon Valley. 

The recall was successful because Persky was part of a culture that men and women in Santa Clara County were no longer willing to tolerate. 

                                        Voters have had enough of Injustice 
​
​Victims who successfully recalled Judge Aaron Persky just one week ago have already begun planning their next move. This  time #metoo will be joined by #himtoo as men and women take on Santa Clara County's most powerful elected official....... Jeff Rosen. 

The Sunday following the recall, Ms. Dauber vowed she was far from finished, and those close to her claim she has set her sights on making sure Santa Clara County Sheriff Candidate Hirakawa does not succeed Sheriff Laurie Smith. Dauber is also reportedly working with a well funded group determined to recall and prosecute Jeff Rosen, the prosecutor who flipped on Emily Doe and supported Persky during the recall campaigns. 

Jeff Rosen's wife, Amber Rosen, was recently elevated to Santa Clara County's family court bench, and like Persky's replacement, DDA Cindy Hendrickson, all eyes are watching these women to see if they are able to shed their prosecutorial mindset when assigned to family court. 

An investigative report set to be released following the July 4th holiday alleges that Rosen has been looting from state and federal funds earmarked for victims like Emily Doe, who Rosen is outright failing.  


                               Victim Looting: Jeff Rosen Steals From Victims

Rosen used others to do his dirty work, as seen in leaked  emails Rosen had indirectly sent to the San Jose Mercury, the Metro News and Bay Area News Service, as he paid pricy reputation services to scrub information from 2008 -2017 that could have ended his career:
​

• In 2008 - Rosen ignored complaints of Racketeering in a high profile divorce case where Judge Persky disqualified Bradford Baugh for Antitrust activity, but failed to report Baugh to the State Bar as Canon 3 D2 of the Judicial Code of Ethics Required. 
• In 2010 Rosen knew a woman making false claims of domestic violence had consulted with divorce attorney Bradford Baugh and Sharon Roper, but Rosen, and his DDA Allison Filo refused to prosecute the false claims, forgery or the lawyers who profited from such criminal activity. 
• In 2011 Rosen campaigned hard from Shir Hadash,  the Jewish congregation that also elected Mike Wasserman, and shows Rabbi Aron covering up sexual assault and harassment at the hands of Rabbis she supervised. 
• In 2012 Rosen falsely accused several high profile Silicon Valley men, when their accusers were not credible. This occurred as Rosen advanced a false narrative on Audrie Pott's suicide  and threatened students at Saratoga High School into taking a plea deal, which ruined their lives.
• In 2013 Rosen advanced his cyberbullying agenda with Larry and Sheila Potts,  as Rosen covered up domestic violence Audrie had witnessed in her own home after being legally separated from her biological father Michael Lazarin. Robert Allard, a personal friend of Rosen's appears to have covered up the sexual harassment at Shir Hadash and further went on a campaign to run off reporters who were interested in Lazarin' s story. 
• In 2014 Rosen took cash payoffs from high rollers  connected with Shir Hadash,  all of which never made it to Rosen's campaign  disclosures and as Rosen was falsely accusing several of his political adversaries. 
• In 2015 Rosen continued to give 49ers football players and corrupt cops a free pass. 
• In 2016 Rosen climbed on the #metoo movement and pretended to fight for Emily Doe, only to switch sides and support Judge Persky in an Anti- recall, where Rosen lent his office and opposed those who supported Emily Doe in the recall campaign. 
• In 2017 Rosen's office was blasted for failing to prosecute bad cops in the local jails following  the death of Michael Tyree, Patrick Missud and others who never got media attention. 

A recent plea on Patch.com shows that Rosen has many more victims than Emily Doe and is selectively prosecuting people who make false allegations.  

Public Records from California's Office of Emergency Services show Rosen has been looting from the state and federal money that tax payers pay to protect and support victims of sexual assault, rape, domestic violence and other violent crimes. 

Rosen's Victim Looting has outraged leaders in the #metoo movement, and local tax payers who are calling for Rosen's removal. 

In addition to a  #RecallJeffRosen campaign, set to launch in the coming months, based on a #VictimLooting platform, local residents are planning a class action lawsuit  poised to be attack Santa Clara County ,and Jeff Rosen individually, for wasting taxpayer funds, and for misusing the DA's Office, where Marsy's Law demands the protection of victims, and the  prosecution of false claims that serve to harm real victims.  

---